Yesterday by Iel

sábado, 2 de novembro de 2013

Dialogue between reason and faith



Dear Friends, strengthen the faith is the way to achieve peace and acceptance of things you can not change and those are the doorway to happiness.
But having faith does not mean  to abdicate reason. Rather, faith and reason may be claimed as allies as the philosopher and theologian Thomas Aquinas said.
I am a professor of economics and ask permission for, based on reason, show the path of faith, using as argument one of the fastest-growing areas in microeconomics today is that game theory.
Game Theory is actually a branch of applied mathematics that studies strategic situations and where players choose different actions in an attempt to improve their outcome or "gain."
The first formal publication on Game Theory, date1838, in Researches into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth, by the French philosopher and mathematician Antoine Augustin Cournot.
However, the North American mathematician, John von Neumann, is considered the founder of game theory. In 1944 he released The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior in co-authorship with the Austrian economist Oskar Morgensten.
Game theory assumes that people act rationally and thus seek strategies of decision such that the result depends not only on ones own strategy but also the strategies of other players involved in a game.
A game consists of players, available strategies for these players and a reward or payment for each combination of strategy.
One of the most famous games is the "prisoner's dilemma" which was presented by mathematician Albert Tucker in 1953 and has many implications in the study of cooperation and non-cooperation between individuals.
The situation is as follows: two individuals are suspected of committing a crime. The sheriff  tells each separately:
If you do not confess and the other also does not confess, we can not do anything because we have no evidence against you and after two days you two will be released. But if you do not confess and the other confesses, he will be free  because of the cooperation with the police and you will be 20 years in prison.
On the other hand if you confess and the other does not confess, you will be free from prison  and your accomplice will be 20 years in prison. If both you and the other suspect confess, both will be jailed for two years.
 Confess means not cooperate with the partner and not confessing means cooperate with the partner and not confessing means cooperate.


The other suspect cooperates with you
The other suspect does not cooperate with you
You cooperate with the other suspect

2 days, 2 days

20 years, 0
You do not cooperate with the other suspect


0, 20 years
2 years, 2 years




Look that not cooperate is the dominant strategy of the game as regardless of what your opponent decide this is the best strategy for any of the two players. In fact If you are the blue players and the red player cooperate, it is better for you, the blue player not you cooperate as be free iis better than  be 2 days on jail. If the read players do not cooperate it is also better for you not to cooperate as 2 years in prision is much better than 20 years. The red player will also think the same as for him also is better not cooperate regardless what you decide.
If you haven't watched the movie "A Beautiful Mind", you should. It is about John Nash (played by Russell Crowe) who won the Nobel Prize in economics for his foundational contributions to game theory and “Nash Equilibrium”.
In The prisioner’s dilemma above  the result: 2 years, 2 years is a Nash Equilibrium and is the result of the game. Look that this is NOT the best result for both players but is possible result based on on the expectation of the decision of the other players which precisely describes a strategy like that.
In fact if the blue player decides to cooperate would be better to the red player not to cooperate as be free is better than stay in prision even if it is only for 2 days and if the red player not cooperate would be better also for the blue player not to cooperate as 2 years of prision is much better than 20 years.
However if the blue player do not cooperate. It is better for the red player not cooperate as 2 years is better than twenty years and if the red players really do not cooperate it is better for the blue player not to cooperate too. So this is a Nash Equilibrium as is the best response of each player for what each one think the other player should do.
The best result for both players would be do stay 2 days each but this result is the cooperative which will not be the result of a simultaneous game like that that is played only once.
So the non cooperative strategy is a dominant strategy and a Nash equilibrium.
Using this same principle, we can decide whether or not we should have faith in God. Watch the match below:

Exist
Does not exist
You believe
You go to heaven
You  have the comfort in life
You  do not believe

You go to hell
Nothing happens


Note that if you believe in God and cultivate the faith  one of these two results you'll get:
If God does exist you will go to heaven when called from this world and there will meet with your beloved.
If God does not exist, nonetheless believe and have faith is a rational option because as a result you will have the consolation in life in difficult times;
But if you do not believe and God really exists you are doomed to go to hell or  nothing happens.
What should be your strategy? See to believe is a rational strategy and is the equilibrium outcome of the game. In fact it is a dominant strategy. Therefore it is rational to have faith! Paradoxical as it may seem. So let us prepare, strengthen our faith and believe that our loved ones are well. One day we will meet again!
“For those who have faith, no explanation is necessary. For those without faith, no explanation is possible."
St. Thomas Aquinas

Eveline Carvalho, Ph.D, mom of Iel (in heaven), Breno and Jessica

terça-feira, 15 de outubro de 2013

One more signal



Dear Friends, Today is a year and six months since my beloved son, my firstborn, Daniel Rubio Carvalho Barbosa, went to heaven. I woke up desolate, sad and crying a lot. I made my prayer of surrender to the Father, got up, washed my tears, wear a shirt that has the face of my son Iel on it and went out looking for a church here in Belém, state of Pará,  where I came to visit my daughter and to participate in the Cirio de Nazaré, which is a great event of faith in  Brazil. On the way I was thinking about my beloved son and how he would be today ... On the way back I walked into a newsstand and came across a book whose title was "playing chess with the angels." I got it as a message from him to me. That's what he's doing in heaven with the angels playing chess! He is one of them and play chess was what he most loved to do here! I'm better. Especially because of the cute messages for Teacher's Day I had received from dear students. Kisses for everyone.

Mais um sinal



Queridos amigos, Hoje faz um ano e seis meses que meu amado filho, meu promogênito, Daniel Rubio Barbosa Carvalho, foi para o céu. Acordei desolada, triste e chorando muito. Fiz minha oração de entrega ao Pai, me levantei, lavei as lágrimas, vesti uma camisa estampada com o rosto do Iel e sai à procura de uma igreja aqui em Belém onde vim visitar minha filha e participar do Círio de Nazaré. No caminho fiquei pensando no meu Iel e como ele estaria...Na volta entrei em uma banca de revista e me deparei com um livro cujo título era: "jogando xadrez com os anjos". Entendi como uma mensagem dele para mim. É isso que ele está fazendo no céu: jogando xadrez com os anjos. Ele é um deles e jogar xadrez era o que ele mais gostava de fazer aqui! Estou melhor. Principalmente pelas lindas mensagens pelo dia do professor que já recebi de alunos queridos. Beijos em todos.

domingo, 13 de outubro de 2013

Síndrome da Ovelha Perdida




Na bíblia tem uma bonita passagem em Lucas que bem descreve o que sentimos:
"Qual de vocês que, possuindo cem ovelhas, e perdendo uma, não deixa as noventa e nove no campo e vai atrás da ovelha perdida, até encontrá-la?”Lucas 15.
Temos outras ovelhas, outros filhos e pessoas que precisam de nós. Mas sofremos da síndrome da ovelha perdida. Nos sentimos incompletos porque não temos em nossas mãos aquela ovelha tão amada. Ela na verdade se tornou mais importante do que todas as outras e a falta dela não tem fim. Não aceitamos que ela se torne passado.
A única solução é carrega-la no coração hoje e sempre. Assim, mudo minha análise de mundo. Hoje minha análise é positiva, o que é, e não normativa, o que deveria ser. Assim, consigo ver algo de bom na espada que transpassou meu coração: hoje não temo mais o amanhã nem vivo mais com a ansiedade de antes.
Tenho uma conexão direta com outra dimensão e não sou mais só terra. Me comunico intimamente com meu filho amado e sei que ele participa espiritualmente comigo do presente. Somos e seremos eternamente  unidos no amor.

Syndrome of the Lost Sheep



In the Bible has a beautiful passage in Luke that describes well what we feel :
" Which of you has a hundred sheep and loses one , does not leave the ninety -nine in the open country and go after the lost sheep until he finds it? " Luke 15 .
We have other sheep , other children and people who need us . But suffer from the syndrome of the lost sheep . We feel incomplete because we do not have in our hands that sheep so loved . He actually became more important than all others and lack of him has no end . We do not accept that becomes past.
The only solution is to carry him into the heart today and always . So I change my analysis world. Today my analysis is positive, what is, not normative , what should be . So, I can see something good in the sword that pierced my heart: today I no longer fear tomorrow or live longer with anxiety as before.
I have a direct connection to another dimension and I am no longer just land . I communicate closely with my beloved son and I know that spiritually he participates with me of the present. We are and we will be eternally united in love .


sábado, 5 de outubro de 2013

Não é o tempo




Muitas pessoas com que me encontro costumam atribuir a minha melhora de atitude ao  tempo.
Eu não concordo. A fé ajuda bastante mas acho que é também o cansaço
Sim, o cansaço de pensar no que passou
Cansaço de chorar e de sofrer com o que não pode ser alterado.
E, como reação ao cansaço, me concentro no que faço.
Assim procuro manter uma atitude de menos questionamento que tanto perturba.
Tento encontrar o propósito da minha vida Naquele que reestabelece o caminho
E vivo o dia de hoje tentando acertar e aceitando.
“Estou concentrando minhas energias unicamente nisso: esquecer o que já passou e avançar  para o que está na minha frente” Filipenses 3-13.
Afinal, nada separa a mãe de um filho nem o tempo, nem o espaço.

It is not the time



Many people I encounter usually attribute my improvement in attitude to time.
I do not agree. I am sure it is Faith that helps a lot together with the fatigue
Yes, tired of thinking about what happened
Tired of crying and suffering with what can not be changed.
And, as a reaction to tiredness, do I focus on today
So I try to keep an attitude of questioning less that disturbs a lot
I try to find the purpose of my life in Him that  restores the path
And live this day trying to do better and accepting.
"I'm focusing my energies solely in this: forgetting what is past and move on to what's in front of me" Philippians 3-13.
After all, nothing separates the mother of a child neither time nor space.